The
Hellenic Chapter of the Club of Rome held its
inaugural event
at the Athens Club, on May 26, 2008. Professor Nikiforos
Diamandouros, the European Ombudsman,
was the distinguished guest speaker. The event was chaired by
the Founder and President of the Hellenic Chapter
of the Club of Rome and President of the Biopolitics International
Organisation, Professor Agni Vlavianos Arvanitis, and
was attended by many eminent personalities, including ambassadors
and dignitaries from several countries, academics, scholars, business
leaders, and other people of influence.
Professor
Diamandouros addressed key issues concerning the role, responsibilities
and vision of the European Ombudsman institution, and answered
questions from the audience. He emphasised that European citizens
have rights extending beyond their participation in national elections;
they can also petition the European Parliament and have the right
of access to the European Ombudsman in dealing with European institutions
across the European Union. More specifically, Professor Diamandouros
explained that:
“The
ombudsman institution originated in Sweden in 1809 and has since
expanded to over 60 countries in the world. To this day, the ombudsman
institution applies to 22 European countries. The European Ombudsman
is elected by parliament. The goal of an ombudsman is to try to
deal with complaints against European institutions. It can be
difficult to explain where this responsibility begins and where
it ends. If the case regards a violation of European law by the
European civil service, people can come to me. However, an ombudsman
has no power to impose binding decisions. The ombudsman acts as
an external mechanism of control of the public administration,
whose mandate it is to provide recommendations and opinions but
does not have the power to impose sanctions.
You
might ask: what is the point of having ombudsmen if they cannot
impose their views? Does an ombudsman act as a fig leaf for the
government, just a legal way out of difficult situations?
The answer is that, as the situation stands today, there is a
very high degree of compliance of the European public administration
with non-binding decisions, because the rule of law is deeply
entrenched at the European level. As a result, the European public
administration cannot easily ignore a recommendation by the ombudsman.
Therefore the credibility of the institution is well established.
Complaints
reaching the ombudsman fall mainly under four large categories:
1) Lack of transparency, the failure to provide access to documents
through negligence or abuse of power.
2) Personnel issues regarding mainly recruitment institutions.
3) Lack of the appropriate services provided to small or medium
enterprises.
4) Violations of a mandate.
The
ombudsman’s function complements that of the courts, and
his services can be invaluable. Ombudsmen believe that good administration
does not necessarily fall under the law. An ombudsman can lighten
the burden of the courts, by providing citizens or users with
a much more flexible and free service, which is much faster than
a court and can find friendly solutions, as he does not have to
decide for or against an issue. The ombudsman’s service
is a truly democratic institution, which has been providing solutions
on issues concerning citizens and residents in over 25 European
countries. It is hoped that it will expand in the near future
to more countries and in more languages, so as to meet the needs
of a growing number of people who use it.”